status of forked zlibs in rsync and zsync

Till Maas opensource at till.name
Mon Sep 28 20:21:42 UTC 2009


On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:53:21PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:

> Secondly, where would be the appropriate place to propose accepting
> zsync with the internal zlib? Is that something I should bring to the
> packaging committee?

This proposal has already been declined by FESCo:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/134

Regards
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090928/9bb67d15/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list