ABRT considered painful

[Jiri Moskovcak]

On 12/31/2009 07:11 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> 2009/12/29 Michael Schwendt<mschwendt at gmail.com>:
>> What's wrong with ABRT?
>>
>> Originally, with stock F-12, I had received a couple of good backtraces in
>> bugzilla. Incredibly useful. A wonderful improvement over F-11 and older.
>>
>> And later? - Recently, in all the backtraces dozens of debuginfo packages
>> are missing. :-(
>
> Locally, for the past few days, debuginfo packages have failed to
> install for me because I have the rpmfusion-{free,nonfree}
> repositories activated, and the main mirrorlist for rpmfusion seems to
> have gone down, so debuginfo never completes, and abrt carries on its
> merry way. I suspect others are seeing this.
>

ABRT 1.0.2 should fix the problems with installing the debug packages, 
the only problem I know about is when some of the enabled repositories 
is down - then the yum fails to download debuginfo even if it's in 
working directory and there is not much ABRT can do about this.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: jmoskovc.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 126 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20100102/9858ac88/attachment.vcf>