From zzw_happy at yahoo.com.cn Tue Aug 9 04:04:45 2005 From: zzw_happy at yahoo.com.cn (William.Zhang) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:04:45 +0800 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the document of performance of fedora DS ? Message-ID: <008901c59c97$7d511df0$6200a8c0@zhangzw> thanks in advance. ???????????????????????????????????????b??j(?????????????????????????????????????m???r?j)???h??(??? From zzw_happy at yahoo.com.cn Tue Aug 9 03:27:54 2005 From: zzw_happy at yahoo.com.cn (William.Zhang) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 11:27:54 +0800 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the document of performance of fedora DS ? Message-ID: <005c01c59c92$56549830$6200a8c0@zhangzw> thanks in advance. ???????????????????????????????????????b??j(?????????????????????????????????????m???r?j)???h??(??? From zzw_happy at yahoo.com.cn Tue Aug 9 03:46:34 2005 From: zzw_happy at yahoo.com.cn (William.Zhang) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 11:46:34 +0800 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the document of performance of fedora DS ? Message-ID: <007301c59c94$f1df8e20$6200a8c0@zhangzw> thanks in advance. ???????????????????????????????????????b??j(?????????????????????????????????????m???r?j)???h??(??? From zzw_happy at yahoo.com.cn Tue Aug 9 02:12:17 2005 From: zzw_happy at yahoo.com.cn (William.Zhang) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:12:17 +0800 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the document of performance of fedora DS ? Message-ID: <004001c59c87$cbdaf690$6200a8c0@zhangzw> thanks in advance.???????????????????????????????????????b??j(?????????????????????????????????????m???r?j)???h??(??? From zhangzw at dcc-bj.com Tue Aug 9 02:01:14 2005 From: zhangzw at dcc-bj.com (Zhang Zhi Wei) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:01:14 +0800 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the document of performance of fedora DS ? Message-ID: <002601c59c86$3ad4c320$6200a8c0@zhangzw> thanks in advance. From rmeggins at redhat.com Tue Aug 9 13:52:28 2005 From: rmeggins at redhat.com (Rich Megginson) Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 07:52:28 -0600 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the document of performance of fedora DS ? In-Reply-To: <008901c59c97$7d511df0$6200a8c0@zhangzw> References: <008901c59c97$7d511df0$6200a8c0@zhangzw> Message-ID: <42F8B51C.1090007@redhat.com> We don't have any published performance numbers or benchmarks. We're working on putting something together. But in the meantime, I will say that 1) FDS performs good enough for any application where read/search performance is more critical than write performance (otherwise, use an RDBMS) 2) FDS is faster, scales better, and is more reliable than most LDAP servers 3) No LDAP server performs significantly better than FDS - in certain cases under certain conditions, some LDAP servers perform very slightly better, and that usually requires a lot of careful config file tuning William.Zhang wrote: > thanks in advance. >???????????????????????????????????????b??j(?????????????????????????????????????m???r?j)???h??(??? > >-- >Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3312 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From zzw_happy at yahoo.com.cn Wed Aug 10 00:58:24 2005 From: zzw_happy at yahoo.com.cn (William.Zhang) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:58:24 +0800 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the documentof performance of fedora DS ? References: <008901c59c97$7d511df0$6200a8c0@zhangzw> <42F8B51C.1090007@redhat.com> Message-ID: <005b01c59d46$9d8c0d00$6200a8c0@zhangzw> Thanks for your reply. In my project we need a ldap server, some prefer fedora DS and other Sun ONE directory server. so i want some data of performance of these two. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rich Megginson" To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 9:52 PM Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the documentof performance of fedora DS ? > -- > Fedora-directory-devel mailing list > Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel >???????????????????????????????????????b??j(?????????????????????????????????????m???r?j)???h??(??? From rmeggins at redhat.com Wed Aug 10 02:12:08 2005 From: rmeggins at redhat.com (Rich Megginson) Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 20:12:08 -0600 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the documentof performance of fedora DS ? In-Reply-To: <005b01c59d46$9d8c0d00$6200a8c0@zhangzw> References: <008901c59c97$7d511df0$6200a8c0@zhangzw> <42F8B51C.1090007@redhat.com> <005b01c59d46$9d8c0d00$6200a8c0@zhangzw> Message-ID: <42F96278.2050103@redhat.com> William.Zhang wrote: >Thanks for your reply. >In my project we need a ldap server, some prefer fedora DS and other Sun ONE directory server. >so i want some data of performance of these two. > > The performance of the two is roughly the same. I don't know if you were aware, but Sun does not allow third parties to publish performance comparisons between Sun DS and other LDAP servers - it violates the terms of the Sun DS license agreement. So, unless Sun has published performance specs, you probably won't find any. You'll have to base your decision on something other than performance. >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Rich Megginson" >To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." >Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 9:52 PM >Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the documentof performance of fedora DS ? > > > > >>-- >>Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >>Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel >>???????????????????????????????????????b??j(?????????????????????????????????????m???r?j)???h??(??? >> >> > >-- >Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3312 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From zzw_happy at yahoo.com.cn Wed Aug 10 02:50:07 2005 From: zzw_happy at yahoo.com.cn (William.Zhang) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:50:07 +0800 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has thedocumentof performance of fedora DS ? References: <008901c59c97$7d511df0$6200a8c0@zhangzw> <42F8B51C.1090007@redhat.com><005b01c59d46$9d8c0d00$6200a8c0@zhangzw> <42F96278.2050103@redhat.com> Message-ID: <011901c59d56$4cccddd0$6200a8c0@zhangzw> Dear : thank you very much , i do know nothing of the license. ----------------- Regards. Zhang Zhi Wei ----- Original Message ----- From: Rich Megginson To: Fedora Directory server developer discussion. Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 10:12 AM Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has thedocumentof performance of fedora DS ? William.Zhang wrote: Thanks for your reply. In my project we need a ldap server, some prefer fedora DS and other Sun ONE directory server. so i want some data of performance of these two. The performance of the two is roughly the same. I don't know if you were aware, but Sun does not allow third parties to publish performance comparisons between Sun DS and other LDAP servers - it violates the terms of the Sun DS license agreement. So, unless Sun has published performance specs, you probably won't find any. You'll have to base your decision on something other than performance. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rich Megginson" To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 9:52 PM Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the documentof performance of fedora DS ? -- Fedora-directory-devel mailing list Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel???????????????????????????????????????b??j(?????????????????????????????????????m???r?j)???h??(??? From pete at openrowley.com Wed Aug 10 02:00:05 2005 From: pete at openrowley.com (Pete Rowley) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 19:00:05 -0700 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the documentofperformance of fedora DS ? In-Reply-To: <005b01c59d46$9d8c0d00$6200a8c0@zhangzw> Message-ID: <200508100255.j7A2tt3C026828@mx1.redhat.com> > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-directory-devel-bounces at redhat.com > [mailto:fedora-directory-devel-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf > Of William.Zhang > Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 5:58 PM > To: Fedora Directory server developer discussion. > Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the > documentofperformance of fedora DS ? > > Thanks for your reply. > In my project we need a ldap server, some prefer fedora DS > and other Sun ONE directory server. > so i want some data of performance of these two. The answer to that is substantially similar - given that they were the same server not so long ago :) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rich Megginson" > To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." > > Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 9:52 PM > Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does anyone has the > documentof performance of fedora DS ? > > > > -- > > Fedora-directory-devel mailing list > > Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel > >??????????????????????????????????????b?j(?????????????????? ??????????????????m??r?)??h?(?? > > -- > Fedora-directory-devel mailing list > Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel > From tj_yang at hotmail.com Tue Aug 23 03:42:26 2005 From: tj_yang at hotmail.com (T.J. Yang) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:42:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account Message-ID: Hi, all How do I get a wiki account to update FDS wiki site ? About me: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/User:Tjyang T.J. Yang From tj_yang at hotmail.com Tue Aug 23 03:56:37 2005 From: tj_yang at hotmail.com (T.J. Yang) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:56:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Why I am here ? Message-ID: To help and learn LDAP. To Help: create FDS 7.1 rpm,pkgadd and hp depot packages. To Lean: I heard it is possible to create a pure ldap authentication environment. ie any vaild user in a ldap server can login into a RH/Solaris box without adding an user entry in local /etc/passwd file. I was able to configure proftpd use ldap authentication, and wondering why not sshd or telnetd ? My last attempt ended with ldap guru saying it is on ldap server side(it need to support a RFCxxxx). The goal is to escape NIS authentication and go to a ldap unix environment. T.J. Yang From rmeggins at redhat.com Tue Aug 23 13:04:55 2005 From: rmeggins at redhat.com (Rich Megginson) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:04:55 -0600 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <430B1EF7.8050905@redhat.com> T.J. Yang wrote: > Hi, all > > How do I get a wiki account to update FDS wiki site ? Accounts are not yet open to the public. However, I would be happy to review and post any contributions you want to make. > > About me: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/User:Tjyang > > > T.J. Yang > > > -- > Fedora-directory-devel mailing list > Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3312 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From rmeggins at redhat.com Tue Aug 23 13:14:54 2005 From: rmeggins at redhat.com (Rich Megginson) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:14:54 -0600 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Why I am here ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <430B214E.7090509@redhat.com> Firstly - welcome! T.J. Yang wrote: > To help and learn LDAP. > > To Help: create FDS 7.1 rpm,pkgadd and hp depot packages. Excellent. We definitely need better native package support. > To Lean: I heard it is possible to create a pure ldap authentication > environment. ie > any vaild user in a ldap server can login into a > RH/Solaris box without adding an user > entry in local /etc/passwd file. > I was able to configure proftpd use ldap authentication, and wondering > why not sshd or telnetd ? If PAM supports it, it should work. > My last attempt ended with ldap guru saying it is on ldap server > side(it need to support a RFCxxxx). > The goal is to escape NIS authentication and go to a ldap unix > environment. Was it RFC 2307? This is the RFC that describes how LDAP can be used to replace NIS - the schema to support NIS clients. > > T.J. Yang > > > -- > Fedora-directory-devel mailing list > Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3312 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From tj_yang at hotmail.com Tue Aug 23 13:42:59 2005 From: tj_yang at hotmail.com (T.J. Yang) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:42:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Why I am here ? In-Reply-To: <430B214E.7090509@redhat.com> Message-ID: >From: Rich Megginson >Reply-To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." > >To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." > >Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Why I am here ? >Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:14:54 -0600 > >Firstly - welcome! > >T.J. Yang wrote: > >>To help and learn LDAP. >> >>To Help: create FDS 7.1 rpm,pkgadd and hp depot packages. > >Excellent. We definitely need better native package support. BUT ... I have no bandwidth to write indvidual fds-7.1.spec package sources or package source for Solaris and HP-UX package management system. What I can offer is to use the TWW HPMS system I know to create one software build source(in xml) to build fds binary and one package build source for all three unix platforms to generate native packages. later tj >>To Lean: I heard it is possible to create a pure ldap authentication >>environment. ie >> any vaild user in a ldap server can login into a >>RH/Solaris box without adding an user >> entry in local /etc/passwd file. >>I was able to configure proftpd use ldap authentication, and wondering why >>not sshd or telnetd ? > >If PAM supports it, it should work. hmm, I remember I configured pam but in the end I need to insert an user name from ldap server into /etc/passwd so that telnet or ssh can work. > >>My last attempt ended with ldap guru saying it is on ldap server side(it >>need to support a RFCxxxx). >>The goal is to escape NIS authentication and go to a ldap unix >>environment. > >Was it RFC 2307? This is the RFC that describes how LDAP can be used to >replace NIS - the schema to support NIS clients. Thanks. I will remember this number by heart now. > >> >>T.J. Yang >> >> >>-- >>Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >>Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel > ><< smime.p7s >> >-- >Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel From tj_yang at hotmail.com Tue Aug 23 13:50:08 2005 From: tj_yang at hotmail.com (T.J. Yang) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:50:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account In-Reply-To: <430B1EF7.8050905@redhat.com> Message-ID: >From: Rich Megginson >Reply-To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." > >To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." > >Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account >Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:04:55 -0600 > >T.J. Yang wrote: > >>Hi, all >> >>How do I get a wiki account to update FDS wiki site ? > >Accounts are not yet open to the public. However, I would be happy to >review and post any contributions you want to make. This will do also. before I can update directly, I will post my FDS wiki notes/comments on wikibooks.org. I will request your review when it is ready. PS, Rich Can you try command line update using perl's mediawiki client. This url has a makefile example to automate the mediawiki update process by command line. http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSolaris/Reference_Manual#wiki_page_batch_update_by_mvs_perl_module if you get it to work, please publish your finding. I believe this will FDS documenation project. tj > >> >>About me: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/User:Tjyang >> >> >>T.J. Yang >> >> >>-- >>Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >>Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel > ><< smime.p7s >> >-- >Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel From rmeggins at redhat.com Tue Aug 23 14:30:46 2005 From: rmeggins at redhat.com (Rich Megginson) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:30:46 -0600 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <430B3316.1000105@redhat.com> T.J. Yang wrote: > >> From: Rich Megginson >> Reply-To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." >> >> To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." >> >> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account >> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:04:55 -0600 >> >> T.J. Yang wrote: >> >>> Hi, all >>> >>> How do I get a wiki account to update FDS wiki site ? >> >> >> Accounts are not yet open to the public. However, I would be happy >> to review and post any contributions you want to make. > > > This will do also. before I can update directly, I will post my FDS > wiki notes/comments on wikibooks.org. I will request your review when > it is ready. > > PS, Rich > > Can you try command line update using perl's mediawiki client. > This url has a makefile example to automate the mediawiki update > process by command line. > http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSolaris/Reference_Manual#wiki_page_batch_update_by_mvs_perl_module > > > if you get it to work, please publish your finding. I believe this > will FDS documenation project. Where can I find the mvs perl module? What other modules does it depend on? I'm assuming it needs http. > > tj > >> >>> >>> About me: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/User:Tjyang >>> >>> >>> T.J. Yang >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >>> Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel >> >> > > >> << smime.p7s >> > > > > > >> -- >> Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >> Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel > > > > -- > Fedora-directory-devel mailing list > Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3312 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From tj_yang at hotmail.com Tue Aug 23 14:47:52 2005 From: tj_yang at hotmail.com (T.J. Yang) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 09:47:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account In-Reply-To: <430B3316.1000105@redhat.com> Message-ID: >T.J. Yang wrote: > >> >>>From: Rich Megginson >>>Reply-To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." >>> >>>To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." >>> >>>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account >>>Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:04:55 -0600 >>> >>>T.J. Yang wrote: >>> >>>>Hi, all >>>> >>>>How do I get a wiki account to update FDS wiki site ? >>> >>> >>>Accounts are not yet open to the public. However, I would be happy to >>>review and post any contributions you want to make. >> >> >>This will do also. before I can update directly, I will post my FDS wiki >>notes/comments on wikibooks.org. I will request your review when it is >>ready. >> >>PS, Rich >> >>Can you try command line update using perl's mediawiki client. >>This url has a makefile example to automate the mediawiki update process >>by command line. >>http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSolaris/Reference_Manual#wiki_page_batch_update_by_mvs_perl_module >> >> >>if you get it to work, please publish your finding. I believe this will >>FDS documenation project. > >Where can I find the mvs perl module? What other modules does it depend >on? I'm assuming it needs http. Execsue my previous sloppy reply. please try this link again. http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSolaris/Reference_Manual#wiki_page_batch_update_by_mvs_perl_module tj From tj_yang at hotmail.com Tue Aug 23 15:01:50 2005 From: tj_yang at hotmail.com (T.J. Yang) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:01:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does FDS 7.1 support RFC2307 ? Message-ID: Thanks for Rich's pointer about rfc2307. I am interest to build a LDAP test server that can eliminate the need of NIS servers. Is this possible ? have anyone done that already ? Ref: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2307.html T.J. Yang From rmeggins at redhat.com Tue Aug 23 18:56:14 2005 From: rmeggins at redhat.com (Rich Megginson) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:56:14 -0600 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <430B714E.7060803@redhat.com> T.J. Yang wrote: > >> T.J. Yang wrote: >> >>> >>>> From: Rich Megginson >>>> Reply-To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." >>>> >>>> To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." >>>> >>>> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account >>>> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:04:55 -0600 >>>> >>>> T.J. Yang wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, all >>>>> >>>>> How do I get a wiki account to update FDS wiki site ? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Accounts are not yet open to the public. However, I would be happy >>>> to review and post any contributions you want to make. >>> >>> >>> >>> This will do also. before I can update directly, I will post my FDS >>> wiki notes/comments on wikibooks.org. I will request your review >>> when it is ready. >>> >>> PS, Rich >>> >>> Can you try command line update using perl's mediawiki client. >>> This url has a makefile example to automate the mediawiki update >>> process by command line. >>> http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSolaris/Reference_Manual#wiki_page_batch_update_by_mvs_perl_module >>> >>> >>> >>> if you get it to work, please publish your finding. I believe this >>> will FDS documenation project. >> >> >> Where can I find the mvs perl module? What other modules does it >> depend on? I'm assuming it needs http. > > > Execsue my previous sloppy reply. please try this link again. > http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSolaris/Reference_Manual#wiki_page_batch_update_by_mvs_perl_module > It works fine. After installation (which I had to force), I was able to do an mvs login, then an "mvs update Main_Page" to get the main page. Thanks! > > tj > > > -- > Fedora-directory-devel mailing list > Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3312 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From tj_yang at hotmail.com Tue Aug 23 21:21:23 2005 From: tj_yang at hotmail.com (T.J. Yang) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:21:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account In-Reply-To: <430B714E.7060803@redhat.com> Message-ID: >From: Rich Megginson >Reply-To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." > >To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." > >Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account >Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:56:14 -0600 > >T.J. Yang wrote: > >> >>>T.J. Yang wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>>From: Rich Megginson >>>>>Reply-To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." >>>>> >>>>>To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." >>>>> >>>>>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account >>>>>Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:04:55 -0600 >>>>> >>>>>T.J. Yang wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Hi, all >>>>>> >>>>>>How do I get a wiki account to update FDS wiki site ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Accounts are not yet open to the public. However, I would be happy to >>>>>review and post any contributions you want to make. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>This will do also. before I can update directly, I will post my FDS >>>>wiki notes/comments on wikibooks.org. I will request your review when it >>>>is ready. >>>> >>>>PS, Rich >>>> >>>>Can you try command line update using perl's mediawiki client. >>>>This url has a makefile example to automate the mediawiki update process >>>>by command line. >>>>http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSolaris/Reference_Manual#wiki_page_batch_update_by_mvs_perl_module >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>if you get it to work, please publish your finding. I believe this will >>>>FDS documenation project. >>> >>> >>>Where can I find the mvs perl module? What other modules does it depend >>>on? I'm assuming it needs http. >> >> >>Execsue my previous sloppy reply. please try this link again. >>http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSolaris/Reference_Manual#wiki_page_batch_update_by_mvs_perl_module >> > >It works fine. After installation (which I had to force), I was able to do >an mvs login, then an "mvs update Main_Page" to get the main page. Can you leave a update trace here at http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki?title=Main_Page&action=history ? The latest update is 08/16/05. tj >Thanks! > >> >>tj >> >> >>-- >>Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >>Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel > ><< smime.p7s >> >-- >Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel From rmeggins at redhat.com Tue Aug 23 23:12:54 2005 From: rmeggins at redhat.com (Rich Megginson) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:12:54 -0600 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <430BAD76.1030103@redhat.com> T.J. Yang wrote: > >> It works fine. After installation (which I had to force), I was able >> to do an mvs login, then an "mvs update Main_Page" to get the main page. > > > Can you leave a update trace here at > http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki?title=Main_Page&action=history ? > > The latest update is 08/16/05. I added more Features to the feature list. The diffs are here - http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki?title=Main_Page&curid=5&diff=0&oldid=2499 Very cool! > > tj > >> Thanks! >> >>> >>> tj >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >>> Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel >> >> > > >> << smime.p7s >> > > > > > >> -- >> Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >> Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel > > > > -- > Fedora-directory-devel mailing list > Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3312 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From kms at passback.co.uk Wed Aug 24 07:37:07 2005 From: kms at passback.co.uk (Keith Sharp) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:37:07 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does FDS 7.1 support RFC2307 ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1124869027.3163.20.camel@animal.passback.co.uk> On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 10:01 -0500, T.J. Yang wrote: > Thanks for Rich's pointer about rfc2307. > > I am interest to build a LDAP test server that can eliminate the need of > NIS servers. > Is this possible ? have anyone done that already ? Yes it should. IIRC all that RFC does is define some new attributes and objectclasses for the server, hence any LDAP server that supports extending the schema should support the RFC. The key part is not the server setup, but the client setup. You need to look at Section 5, and in particular Section 5.1. A good book on this topic is LDAP System Administration by Gerald Carter: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/ldapsa/index.html Keith. From tj_yang at hotmail.com Wed Aug 24 12:11:45 2005 From: tj_yang at hotmail.com (T.J. Yang) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 07:11:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does FDS 7.1 support RFC2307 ? In-Reply-To: <1124869027.3163.20.camel@animal.passback.co.uk> Message-ID: >From: Keith Sharp >Reply-To: kms at passback.co.uk,"Fedora Directory server developer >discussion." >To: fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does FDS 7.1 support RFC2307 ? >Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:37:07 +0100 > >On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 10:01 -0500, T.J. Yang wrote: > > Thanks for Rich's pointer about rfc2307. > > > > I am interest to build a LDAP test server that can eliminate the need >of > > NIS servers. > > Is this possible ? have anyone done that already ? > >Yes it should. IIRC all that RFC does is define some new attributes and >objectclasses for the server, hence any LDAP server that supports >extending the schema should support the RFC. The key part is not the >server setup, but the client setup. You need to look at Section 5, and >in particular Section 5.1. Reading RFC 2307 Section 5.1 and 5.2 but it is still vague for me. Which OS and which software module has Secction 5.2 functions implemented ? > >A good book on this topic is LDAP System Administration by Gerald >Carter: > > http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/ldapsa/index.html I have this book and it will be on my desk, open and be read. tj >Keith. > >-- >Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel From kms at passback.co.uk Wed Aug 24 13:15:43 2005 From: kms at passback.co.uk (Keith Sharp) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:15:43 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does FDS 7.1 support RFC2307 ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1124889343.3163.35.camel@animal.passback.co.uk> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 07:11 -0500, T.J. Yang wrote: > Reading RFC 2307 Section 5.1 and 5.2 but it is still vague for me. > Which OS and which software module has Secction 5.2 functions implemented ? I have done a degree of NIS replacement (passwd, group and automount entries) using the Fedora Core Linux operating system as both the client and the server. The LDAP server I used was OpenLDAP. The functions in section 5.2 are normally implemented in the standard libc library. On Fedora Core that is glibc, and the implementation uses the files /etc/nsswitch.conf to determine which directory to use to lookup information: files, NIS, LDAP, etc. For authentication you may also need to configure the PAM system to use LDAP. Fedora Core provides a utility called system-config-authentication that has a simple GUI for configuring these systems. Support on other operating systems and libc implementations will vary, you should contact the vendors or appropriate support groups for those operating systems. Keith. From rmeggins at redhat.com Wed Aug 24 13:18:45 2005 From: rmeggins at redhat.com (Rich Megginson) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 07:18:45 -0600 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does FDS 7.1 support RFC2307 ? In-Reply-To: <1124889343.3163.35.camel@animal.passback.co.uk> References: <1124889343.3163.35.camel@animal.passback.co.uk> Message-ID: <430C73B5.30707@redhat.com> Keith Sharp wrote: >On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 07:11 -0500, T.J. Yang wrote: > > > >>Reading RFC 2307 Section 5.1 and 5.2 but it is still vague for me. >>Which OS and which software module has Secction 5.2 functions implemented ? >> >> > >I have done a degree of NIS replacement (passwd, group and automount >entries) using the Fedora Core Linux operating system as both the client >and the server. The LDAP server I used was OpenLDAP. > >The functions in section 5.2 are normally implemented in the standard >libc library. On Fedora Core that is glibc, and the implementation uses >the files /etc/nsswitch.conf to determine which directory to use to >lookup information: files, NIS, LDAP, etc. For authentication you may >also need to configure the PAM system to use LDAP. Fedora Core provides >a utility called system-config-authentication that has a simple GUI for >configuring these systems. > >Support on other operating systems and libc implementations will vary, >you should contact the vendors or appropriate support groups for those >operating systems. > > The other tricky thing is determining what level of RFC 2307 support the OS has - the old 2307, the 2307 without the automount information, and the new 2307bis with the public key and automount information. We should try to put together a matrix of OS and server support for this. >Keith. > >-- >Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3312 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From tj_yang at hotmail.com Wed Aug 24 13:33:38 2005 From: tj_yang at hotmail.com (T.J. Yang) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:33:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does FDS 7.1 support RFC2307 ? In-Reply-To: <1124889343.3163.35.camel@animal.passback.co.uk> Message-ID: >From: Keith Sharp >Reply-To: kms at passback.co.uk,"Fedora Directory server developer >discussion." >To: fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does FDS 7.1 support RFC2307 ? >Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:15:43 +0100 > >On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 07:11 -0500, T.J. Yang wrote: > > > Reading RFC 2307 Section 5.1 and 5.2 but it is still vague for me. > > Which OS and which software module has Secction 5.2 functions >implemented ? > >I have done a degree of NIS replacement (passwd, group and automount >entries) using the Fedora Core Linux operating system as both the client >and the server. The LDAP server I used was OpenLDAP. >The functions in section 5.2 are normally implemented in the standard >libc library. On Fedora Core that is glibc, and the implementation uses >the files /etc/nsswitch.conf to determine which directory to use to >lookup information: files, NIS, LDAP, etc. For authentication you may >also need to configure the PAM system to use LDAP. Fedora Core provides >a utility called system-config-authentication that has a simple GUI for >configuring these systems. > I played with LDAP authentition a while back. I was quite happy I could have a ftp server(proftpd ?) setup to use ldap auth. I went on to pursure telnet authentication. after helps from others, I was able to setup a RH9 box to authenticate user from my corporate ldap account. but the catch is before ldap user can login, I need to create that same ldap account locally in /etc/passwd file. This sort of beat the purpose of ldap auth. I havn't pursue this for about two years, Is RHEL3/4 still require the inseration of user entry into /etc/passwd ? My goal is to have configure a Unix box to allow telnet/ssh login from users with a valid ldap account.Also I like to restrict the login access base on a ldap user's group. tj >Support on other operating systems and libc implementations will vary, >you should contact the vendors or appropriate support groups for those >operating systems. > >Keith. > >-- >Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel From irving at maine.edu Wed Aug 24 13:42:38 2005 From: irving at maine.edu (David Irving) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does FDS 7.1 support RFC2307 ? Message-ID: <4D515DBE79C95C44856875D0E26C64D508BE88@exchange.exchange.umf.maine.edu> Nope.. Once in LDAP and everything is configured correctly on the linux box, you don't have to do anything to passwd or shadow to let a user log on to the box. I currently have this kind of setup using RHEL and it works great! -----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-devel-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-devel-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of T.J. Yang Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 9:34 AM To: fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does FDS 7.1 support RFC2307 ? >From: Keith Sharp >Reply-To: kms at passback.co.uk,"Fedora Directory server developer >discussion." >To: fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does FDS 7.1 support RFC2307 ? >Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:15:43 +0100 > >On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 07:11 -0500, T.J. Yang wrote: > > > Reading RFC 2307 Section 5.1 and 5.2 but it is still vague for me. > > Which OS and which software module has Secction 5.2 functions >implemented ? > >I have done a degree of NIS replacement (passwd, group and automount >entries) using the Fedora Core Linux operating system as both the client >and the server. The LDAP server I used was OpenLDAP. >The functions in section 5.2 are normally implemented in the standard >libc library. On Fedora Core that is glibc, and the implementation uses >the files /etc/nsswitch.conf to determine which directory to use to >lookup information: files, NIS, LDAP, etc. For authentication you may >also need to configure the PAM system to use LDAP. Fedora Core provides >a utility called system-config-authentication that has a simple GUI for >configuring these systems. > I played with LDAP authentition a while back. I was quite happy I could have a ftp server(proftpd ?) setup to use ldap auth. I went on to pursure telnet authentication. after helps from others, I was able to setup a RH9 box to authenticate user from my corporate ldap account. but the catch is before ldap user can login, I need to create that same ldap account locally in /etc/passwd file. This sort of beat the purpose of ldap auth. I havn't pursue this for about two years, Is RHEL3/4 still require the inseration of user entry into /etc/passwd ? My goal is to have configure a Unix box to allow telnet/ssh login from users with a valid ldap account.Also I like to restrict the login access base on a ldap user's group. tj >Support on other operating systems and libc implementations will vary, >you should contact the vendors or appropriate support groups for those >operating systems. > >Keith. > >-- >Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel -- Fedora-directory-devel mailing list Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel From jclowser at unitedmessaging.com Wed Aug 24 13:55:52 2005 From: jclowser at unitedmessaging.com (Jeff Clowser) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:55:52 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does FDS 7.1 support RFC2307 ? In-Reply-To: <4D515DBE79C95C44856875D0E26C64D508BE88@exchange.exchange.umf.maine.edu> References: <4D515DBE79C95C44856875D0E26C64D508BE88@exchange.exchange.umf.maine.edu> Message-ID: <430C7C68.5080103@unitedmessaging.com> Last time I played with this, you did still have to create users home directories, though, so you can't completely avoid touching the box. But... a fairly easy way to fix this is to have a cron job that runs periodically that looks at ldap and creates (and deletes if you want) home directories as appropriate. - Jeff David Irving wrote: >Nope.. Once in LDAP and everything is configured correctly on the linux >box, you don't have to do anything to passwd or shadow to let a user log >on to the box. I currently have this kind of setup using RHEL and it >works great! > > From astokes at redhat.com Wed Aug 24 15:36:04 2005 From: astokes at redhat.com (Adam Stokes) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does FDS 7.1 support RFC2307 ? In-Reply-To: <430C7C68.5080103@unitedmessaging.com> References: <4D515DBE79C95C44856875D0E26C64D508BE88@exchange.exchange.umf.maine.edu> <430C7C68.5080103@unitedmessaging.com> Message-ID: <20050824113604.26a80cd9@froman.rdu.redhat.com> On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:55:52 -0400 Jeff Clowser wrote: > Last time I played with this, you did still have to create users home > directories, though, so you can't completely avoid touching the box. > But... a fairly easy way to fix this is to have a cron job that runs > periodically that looks at ldap and creates (and deletes if you want) > home directories as appropriate. > > - Jeff > > David Irving wrote: > > >Nope.. Once in LDAP and everything is configured correctly on the > >linux box, you don't have to do anything to passwd or shadow to let > >a user log on to the box. I currently have this kind of setup using > >RHEL and it works great! > > > > > > -- > Fedora-directory-devel mailing list > Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel I haven't done much work with NIS and FDS, however, in openldap using the nis.schema you could create automount entries that would allow you to mount those home directories on the fly. This is probably a good one for the how-to section, I'll do some research and see what I can come up with. If anyone has any success please feel free to respond to the list and I can get that information posted for others. Thanks -- # adam stokes From jclowser at unitedmessaging.com Wed Aug 24 16:01:14 2005 From: jclowser at unitedmessaging.com (Jeff Clowser) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Does FDS 7.1 support RFC2307 ? In-Reply-To: <20050824113604.26a80cd9@froman.rdu.redhat.com> References: <4D515DBE79C95C44856875D0E26C64D508BE88@exchange.exchange.umf.maine.edu> <430C7C68.5080103@unitedmessaging.com> <20050824113604.26a80cd9@froman.rdu.redhat.com> Message-ID: <430C99CA.7070207@unitedmessaging.com> Adam Stokes wrote: >On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:55:52 -0400 >Jeff Clowser wrote: > > >>Last time I played with this, you did still have to create users home >>directories, though, so you can't completely avoid touching the box. >>But... a fairly easy way to fix this is to have a cron job that runs >>periodically that looks at ldap and creates (and deletes if you want) >>home directories as appropriate. >> >> - Jeff >> >>David Irving wrote: >> >> >>>Nope.. Once in LDAP and everything is configured correctly on the >>>linux box, you don't have to do anything to passwd or shadow to let >>>a user log on to the box. I currently have this kind of setup using >>>RHEL and it works great! >>> >>> >>> >I haven't done much work with NIS and FDS, however, in openldap using >the nis.schema you could create automount entries that would allow you >to mount those home directories on the fly. > Ah - if you have an nfs server with users home directories, you can (and a good idea, I'd say). I was thinking more along the lines of home directories on a local disk, in which case I think you'd have to create home dirs for users. - Jeff From mj at sci.fi Fri Aug 26 16:03:52 2005 From: mj at sci.fi (Mike Jackson) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 19:03:52 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Why I am here ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <430F3D68.6090604@sci.fi> T.J. Yang wrote: > I was able to configure proftpd use ldap authentication, and wondering > why not sshd or telnetd ? They both work, via pam_ldap. > My last attempt ended with ldap guru saying it is on ldap server > side(it need to support a RFCxxxx). Every LDAP server available today can work with pam_ldap. Pam_ldap supports the standard LDAP bind interface. Here is a good page to start with: http://www.yolinux.com/TUTORIALS/LDAP_Authentication.html BR, -- mike From tj_yang at hotmail.com Fri Aug 26 16:33:47 2005 From: tj_yang at hotmail.com (T.J. Yang) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:33:47 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] Why I am here ? In-Reply-To: <430F3D68.6090604@sci.fi> Message-ID: >From: Mike Jackson >Reply-To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." > >To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." > >Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Why I am here ? >Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 19:03:52 +0300 > >T.J. Yang wrote: > >>I was able to configure proftpd use ldap authentication, and wondering why >>not sshd or telnetd ? > >They both work, via pam_ldap. > > >>My last attempt ended with ldap guru saying it is on ldap server side(it >>need to support a RFCxxxx). > >Every LDAP server available today can work with pam_ldap. Pam_ldap supports >the standard LDAP bind interface. > >Here is a good page to start with: > > http://www.yolinux.com/TUTORIALS/LDAP_Authentication.html Thanks for the reply. I will have another test on RHEL AS3.0 to see if I can setup an RH linux box to accept telnet or ssh login via pam_ldap WITHOUT adding same uid into local /etc/passwd first. tj > > >BR, >-- >mike > >-- >Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel From tj_yang at hotmail.com Sat Aug 27 23:33:51 2005 From: tj_yang at hotmail.com (T.J. Yang) Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 18:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account In-Reply-To: <430B1EF7.8050905@redhat.com> Message-ID: >Accounts are not yet open to the public. However, I would be happy to >review and post any contributions you want to make. > At this url http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Client_software please consider to add python-ldap http://python-ldap.sourceforge.net/ tj From tinuviel at sparcs.kaist.ac.kr Sun Aug 28 01:21:54 2005 From: tinuviel at sparcs.kaist.ac.kr (Seo Sanghyeon) Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 10:21:54 +0900 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account In-Reply-To: References: <430B1EF7.8050905@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20050828012154.GA1589@sparcs.kaist.ac.kr> On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 06:33:51PM -0500, T.J. Yang wrote: > At this url http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Client_software > please consider to add python-ldap http://python-ldap.sourceforge.net/ > > tj As well as Luma http://luma.sourceforge.net/ which uses python-ldap, which I found to be a very nice tool now GQ http://biot.com/gq/ is unmaintained. Seo Sanghyeon From mj at sci.fi Sun Aug 28 06:57:41 2005 From: mj at sci.fi (Mike Jackson) Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 09:57:41 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43116065.1020604@sci.fi> T.J. Yang wrote: > At this url http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Client_software > please consider to add python-ldap http://python-ldap.sourceforge.net/ Added. -- mike From mj at sci.fi Sun Aug 28 06:58:05 2005 From: mj at sci.fi (Mike Jackson) Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 09:58:05 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account In-Reply-To: <20050828012154.GA1589@sparcs.kaist.ac.kr> References: <430B1EF7.8050905@redhat.com> <20050828012154.GA1589@sparcs.kaist.ac.kr> Message-ID: <4311607D.6050409@sci.fi> Seo Sanghyeon wrote: > As well as Luma http://luma.sourceforge.net/ which uses python-ldap, > which I found to be a very nice tool now GQ http://biot.com/gq/ is > unmaintained. Added. -- mike From tj_yang at hotmail.com Sun Aug 28 11:32:30 2005 From: tj_yang at hotmail.com (T.J. Yang) Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 06:32:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account In-Reply-To: <43116065.1020604@sci.fi> Message-ID: >From: Mike Jackson >Reply-To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." > >To: "Fedora Directory server developer discussion." > >Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] FDS wiki site account >Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 09:57:41 +0300 > >T.J. Yang wrote: > >>At this url http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Client_software >>please consider to add python-ldap http://python-ldap.sourceforge.net/ > >Added. Not a big deal but I think python-ldap should be added along with perl-ldap in software development kits. tj