[Fedora-directory-devel] Is there any client interface for Linux other than pam_ldap?

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 13:35 -0700, Richard Megginson wrote:
> Leroy Tennison wrote:
> 
> > The reason I ask is that the last time I looked at it I was 
> > disappointed.  The features seemed limited and rudimentary.  You had 
> > to configure the context in a local file and there was no way to 
> > dynamically supply a different one.  If there is a more robust 
> > alternative please let me know, I'd love to try it.  If not please 
> > consider this an enhancement request - the greatest directory server 
> > in the world isn't of great value if the client support is limited.  
> > Thanks for any and all replies.
> 
> I don't know of any.  What are some of the features you would like to 
> see in pam_ldap: the next generation?

From memory, SuSE has pam_unix2, which does some different things, but
I'm likewise unsure what the original poster is asking for.

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College  http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-devel/attachments/20060216/e6117c9a/attachment.sig>