[Fedora-directory-devel] Re: Please Review: Add LDAPI (LDAP over unix domain sockets)

[Pete Rowley]

Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> And where OpenLDAP has done something first, or it's way of doing things
> is more sane, I ask that Fedora DS follow that lead.  I need less, not
> more 'if <vendor>' code...
>
>   
Your if vendor code would be zero. Presumably Samba would be enabled 
with access in line with its operational requirements. Bearing in mind 
that Samba runs as root, it is likely to find that any machine it is 
installed on has anonymous access for root, just like it is allowed to 
actually run as root.
> (In this vane, I so wish nsUniqueID was in standard GUID format, rather
> than %08x-%08x-%08x-%08x...)
>   
I believe we have already discussed this and that I have already agreed 
that we would look at it.

-- 
Pete

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3241 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-devel/attachments/20070222/104eb01a/attachment.bin>