[389-devel] Upgrade procedures
Nathan Kinder
nkinder at redhat.com
Tue Sep 1 21:52:07 UTC 2009
On 09/01/2009 02:23 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> I'm envisioning something like patch files in an RPM - things that can
> easily come and go depending on what needs to be done for a particular
> release. In this case, instead of patch files, these would be short
> perl or shell scripts. These would be invoked once or once per instance.
>
> One way would be to have a large script which would be edited for each
> release, adding or deleting code as needed. This is the way it worked
> in the past - the file quickly becomes "unruly". However, we would
> only have to touch Makefile.am once to add the upgrade script.
You mean like the migrate4to6, migrate5to6, etc. stuff?
>
> Another way would be to have small scripts that could come and go with
> each release. The disadvantage is that we would be constantly
> adding/deleting items from Makefile.am. This is what I would prefer.
I prefer the scriptlet approach too.
How do you envision dealing with upgrading from different versions? For
example, we would need to do much different work upgrading from 1.1 ->
1.3 than we would from 1.2 -> 1.3. Will there be some way for the
scriptlet to specify what versions it needs to be run for?
>
> Before invoking the update scripts, the code would create some sort of
> context, containing information about the config directory, each
> instance, and an identity and credentials that can be used to manage
> each instance. For example, when you run setup-ds-admin.pl -u, it
> uses the uid=admin identity and asks for the password, then uses that
> identity to manage each instance. However, in the case where there is
> just the base ds package, we would need some way to ask or specify the
> identity for each instance. For the UI, I don't think there's any way
> around just simply asking for the username and password for each
> instance (we can default the username to directory manager or the last
> value specified). For .inf file usage, I was thinking about adding a
> new section - [slapd-instancename] - in which you could specify the
> RootDN and RootDNPwd.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> 389-devel mailing list
> 389-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-devel/attachments/20090901/6e378c84/attachment.htm>
More information about the Fedora-directory-devel
mailing list