Does it mean that when "nsslapd-require-secure-binds" is "on" then even the anonymous binds should be made by SSL? Maybe there is some sense in leaving a possibility to have anonymous binds non-SSL and frocing non-anonymous ones to be secure? <div class="gmail_quote">2009/5/15 Rich Megginson <<a href="mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com">rmeggins@redhat.com</a>> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Nathan Kinder wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Fedora-directory-devel mailing list <a href="mailto:Fedora-directory-devel@redhat.com" target="_blank">Fedora-directory-devel@redhat.com</a> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel</a> </blockquote> Looks good. -- Fedora-directory-devel mailing list <a href="mailto:Fedora-directory-devel@redhat.com">Fedora-directory-devel@redhat.com</a> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel</a> </blockquote></div>