[Fedora-directory-users] Virtual DIT views vs hierarchical DIT

[Pete Rowley]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com 
> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf 
> Of Mike Jackson
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 1:03 PM
> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Virtual DIT views vs 
> hierarchical DIT
> 
> Pete Rowley wrote:
> > 
> > Usually you give a third party application a base dn, that 
> base dn can 
> > be a view.  Views were designed such that the client need 
> not know it 
> > is using a view based dit so compatibility isn't much of an 
> issue for most clients.
> > 
> 
> And when the application needs to create it's own arbitrarily 
> named sub branches? I'm talking about applications like 
> Tivoli User Manager, etc.

You mean a sub-branch in the view?  That should work without issue.  Do you
have an example where compatibility like this is definitely broken?