[Fedora-directory-users] user-defined vs. standard schema files

[Rich Megginson]

George Holbert wrote:

> I've copied some custom schema files to the config/schema directory.  
> In the Java console, some of the attributes and objectclasses defined 
> in the custom schema files show up under "Standard", while others show 
> up in "User Defined."
>
> Does anyone know how FDS determines that an attribute or objectclass 
> is "standard" vs. "user-defined"?  I would think everything that is 
> defined in a custom schema file would show up in "user-defined."

We use the X-ORIGIN schema extension with a value of 'user defined'.  
"user-defined" really means "schema that was added over LDAP or using 
the console that's stored in 99user.ldif".

>
> Not sure that this really matters much, but just curious.
>
> Thanks,
> -- George
>
>
> -- 
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3312 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20050901/2fb95f19/attachment.bin>