[Fedora-directory-users] data design for inactive users?

David Boreham david_list at boreham.org
Tue Jun 13 18:23:44 UTC 2006


Scott wrote:

>In our ldap we do not delete users, we deactivate them
>with nsaccountlock. All user entries are in the same
>branch of the tree. In this data structure, all uid's
>are unique and are not used again.
>
>Ok well now our ldap is getting large and I would like
>active users separate from inactive users to provide
>better search performance. AFAIK lot of services keep
>uid's so they cannot be used again. What's a good
>design approach? Do inactive users move to another
>tree? Maybe move to another server and use a referral
>somehow. What do ldap admins do with all this dead
>weight? :)
>  
>
I'm curious why you think search performance will suffer.
Are you worried about totally unindexed searches ?

Some supporting data would be useful : number of users,
inactive users, some example searches that you see slow down,
and so on.

Per se, searches should not be slower when you take the approach
you have.





More information about the Fedora-directory-users mailing list