[Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2

Tue Mar 14 15:06:24 UTC 2006

Bliss, Aaron wrote:

>I've been able to reproduce; after setting the new password policy
>(require 1 digit, 1 special, etc) and then I attempt to use a password
>that isn't compliant, this error is logged and the users new password is
>not accepted.
>[13/Mar/2006:22:19:42 -0500] conn=1073 op=10 RESULT err=19 tag=103
>nentries=0 etime=0
>  
>
Can you find out what this operation is?  It's either an ADD or MOD - 
just search before that line for "conn=1073 op=10".  I'd like to know 
what the DN is.

>So, it looks like everything is working like it is suppose to....it's
>still interesting that I received that error during the upgrade....
>
>Aaron
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bliss,
>Aaron
>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 10:04 PM
>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
>Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds
>1.0.1 to 1.0.2
>
>It only seems to be in the access log 1 time; looks like it only
>happened during the upgrade
>[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=11 RESULT err=19 tag=103
>nentries=0 etime=0 Is there an easy way to verify that the new password
>schema is being used?
>
>Thanks.
>Aaron 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard
>Megginson
>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 9:54 PM
>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
>Cc: Bliss, Aaron
>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds
>1.0.1 to 1.0.2
>
>Bliss, Aaron wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Well, I upgraded the fds rpm; after a reboot all looks okay, however I 
>>noticed this information in the setup logfile; is this indicative that
>>something failed to update properly?    Perhaps the new schema files?
>>How can I verify that the new schema files are in use?  Thanks very 
>>much.
>>
>>Start Slapd Starting Slapd server reconfiguration.
>>Fatal Slapd ERROR: Could not update Directory Server Instance URL 
>>ldap://fds1.preferredcare.org:389/o=NetscapeRoot user id admin DN 
>>cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedora Directory Server,cn=Server 
>>Group,cn=fds1.preferredcare.org,ou=preferredcare.org,o=NetscapeRoot
>>(19:Constraint violation)
>>Configuring Administration Server...
>>InstallInfo: Apache Directory "ApacheDir" is missing. 
>>
>>The proper fds version is disaplyed in the display console, and the new
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>password enforcement options seem to be available.
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>Check your directory server access log - look for err=19 - constraint
>violation - to see which operation it's complaining about.
>
>  
>
>>Aaron
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Bliss, Aaron
>>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM
>>To: 'General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.'
>>Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds
>>1.0.1 to 1.0.2
>>
>>Ah, thanks again.
>>
>>Aaron
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
>>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>Megginson
>>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM
>>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
>>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds
>>1.0.1 to 1.0.2
>>
>>Bliss, Aaron wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Thanks;  just so I understand, I have to run the setup script even 
>>>though my databases have already been configured?  I did not have to 
>>>do
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>this on my test box in order to upgrade.  Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Setup will copy in the new schema files required to use the new 
>>password syntax checking, so if you skip that, you'll have to copy them
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>in manually.  Setup will also make sure the console reports the correct
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>version of directory server.
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Aaron
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
>>>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of 
>>>Richard
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Megginson
>>>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:59 PM
>>>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
>>>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from 
>>>fds
>>>1.0.1 to 1.0.2
>>>
>>>Bliss, Aaron wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>I'm planning on upgrading both my supplier and consumer fds servers 
>>>>tonight; do I need to worry about their server certificates?  I'll 
>>>>just
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>be running rpm -Uvh fedora....Thanks very much.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Upgrade shouldn't touch any ssl information.
>>>
>>>After doing the rpm -U, do cd /opt/fedora-ds ; ./setup/setup and 
>>>follow
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>the prompts.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Aaron
>>>>
>>>>www.preferredcare.org
>>>>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D.
>>>>        
>>>>
>
>  
>
>>>>Power and Associates
>>>>
>>>>Confidentiality Notice:
>>>>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may 
>>>contain privileged or confidential information.  If the reader of this
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent 
>>>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
>>>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
>>>information is prohibited.  If you have received this communication in
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy 
>>>the copies you received.
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>>>>Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>>>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>www.preferredcare.org
>>>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. 
>>>Power and Associates
>>>
>>>Confidentiality Notice:
>>>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may 
>>contain privileged or confidential information.  If the reader of this 
>>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent 
>>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
>>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
>>information is prohibited.  If you have received this communication in 
>>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy 
>>the copies you received.
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>--
>>>Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>>>Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>www.preferredcare.org
>>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. 
>>Power and Associates
>>
>>Confidentiality Notice:
>>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for
>>    
>>
>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may
>contain privileged or confidential information.  If the reader of this
>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information
>is prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please
>notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you
>received.
>  
>
>>--
>>Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>>Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>www.preferredcare.org
>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D.
>Power and Associates
>
>Confidentiality Notice:
>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the
>exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain
>privileged or confidential information.  If the reader of this message
>is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to
>deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is
>prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please
>notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you
>received.
>
>
>--
>Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
>
>--
>Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3178 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20060314/e0ba997e/attachment.bin>