[Fedora-directory-users] slapd crash on replicate attempt

[Richard Megginson]

Justin Crawford wrote:
> I think the replication error may be a response to the crash, and not 
> necessarily a clue to the the cause. 
>  
> One of the slapd processes just crashed again, and the logs on the 
> second server show only the same replication error.  I take it to mean 
> the replication can't continue, because the slapd process on the other 
> server has crashed.
>  
> Anyway, today is the first time in 5 months that either of these 
> servers has had any issue whatsoever.
Something must have changed.  Even something that may appear at first 
glance to be innocuous.

Are you using VLV (browsing index in the console)?
> Are there other documented instances of the fedora server crashing 
> hard without generating errors? 
> We're running 1.0.2.
>  
> $ uname -r -v -p -i -o
> 2.6.9-34.0.2.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Jun 30 10:32:04 EDT 2006 x86_64 x86_64 
> GNU/Linux
>  
> Thanks!
> Justin
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
>     [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] *On Behalf Of
>     *Eddie C
>     *Sent:* Monday, March 05, 2007 12:00 PM
>     *To:* General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
>     *Subject:* Re: [Fedora-directory-users] slapd crash on replicate
>     attempt
>
>     Make sure that when you created an account for replication that
>     the acount did not expire and lock out.
>
>     On 3/5/07, *Justin Crawford* < Justin.Crawford at cusys.edu
>     <mailto:Justin.Crawford at cusys.edu>> wrote:
>
>         Hi-
>
>         This morning a multi-master pair that has been running since
>         Nov. 5
>         crashed.  There is only one clue, in the error log of one of the
>         directories:
>
>         NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt="cn=auth_ldap2 to auth_ldap1"
>         (ldap:389):
>         Unable to receive the response for a startReplication extended
>         operation
>         to consumer (Can't contact LDAP server). Will retry later.
>
>         That appears to be the last thing either process said before
>         they both
>         gave up, almost simultaneously.
>
>         Can anyone help me understand what happened?
>
>         It looks like the replication agreements survived; at least,
>         in the
>         replication configuration section of each directory's console,
>         there is
>         a message with a current time saying "Incremental update
>         succeeded."
>
>         Thanks!
>
>         Justin
>
>         --
>         Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>         Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>         <mailto:Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>
>         https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>   
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3245 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20070306/669dbc28/attachment.bin>