[Fedora-directory-users] Isit possibleto migrateBerkeley 4.2(32bit)based directory to 4.2 (64bit)

Reinhard Nappert rnappert at juniper.net
Fri Apr 4 16:35:36 UTC 2008


Yes, this works! How about existing replication agreements? 

-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich
Megginson
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 12:09 PM
To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Isit possibleto migrateBerkeley
4.2(32bit)based directory to 4.2 (64bit)

Reinhard Nappert wrote:
> No, it does not. It looks like you need a value.
>   
What if you shutdown, delete that entry completely from dse.ldif, then
restart?
> So, I installed a 64 bit version from scratch, took that generated 
> value in the migrated dse.ldif and started the server. This works, 
> however it is kind of ugly. Now, this brings up another question: If I

> do something like that (with perl?), do I screw up my replication
agreements?
>
> -Reinhard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich 
> Megginson
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 10:19 AM
> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Is it possibleto migrateBerkeley
> 4.2(32bit) based directory to 4.2 (64bit)
>
> Reinhard Nappert wrote:
>   
>> Rick,
>>
>> It looks like it is ok just using the same old data and point to the 
>> db directory. However, I experienced one hick-up. During the 
>> migration
>>     
>
>   
>> of the config data (dse.ldif) within migrate-ds.pl, the migration of 
>> the nsstate attribute for the uniqueid generator fails. When starting

>> the directory, I get:
>> [03/Apr/2008:15:46:26 -0400] uuid - read_state: failed to get 
>> generator's state
>> [03/Apr/2008:15:46:26 -0400] uuid - uuid_init: failed to get 
>> generator's state
>> [03/Apr/2008:15:46:26 -0400] uniqueid generator - uniqueIDGenInit:
>> generator ini
>> tialization failed
>>
>> Do you have any idea?
>>   
>>     
> Yes.  Unfortunately, that attribute contains raw binary data that may 
> not be 64-bit clean.  If you shutdown the server, delete that 
> attribute, and start the server, does it work?
>   
>> -Reinhard
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
>> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich 
>> Megginson
>> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 1:30 PM
>> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
>> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Is it possible to
>>     
> migrateBerkeley
>   
>> 4.2(32bit) based directory to 4.2 (64bit)
>>
>> Reinhard Nappert wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Thanks Rick,
>>>
>>> You are saying, I have to export it at first.
>>>
>>> Initially, I just built 1.1 in 32bit mode (with the identical db 
>>> library). With that, I even was just using the same directory and it

>>> worked fine. So, I guess I have to go the export/import way.
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>> I'm just really not sure.  I don't think we write any longs or other 
>> 64-bit values to the database with 1.1.  So it may just work and be 
>> fine.
>>   
>>     
>>> Cheers,
>>> -Reinhard
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
>>> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich

>>> Megginson
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 12:12 PM
>>> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
>>> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Is it possible to migrate 
>>> Berkeley
>>> 4.2(32bit) based directory to 4.2 (64bit)
>>>
>>> Reinhard Nappert wrote:
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone know, if that works?
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> Are you talking about the migration script migrate-ds-admin.pl?  If 
>>> so, then yes.  You will first have to export your databases to ldif 
>>> e.g. for a Fedora DS 1.0.4 installation:
>>> cd /opt/fedora-ds/slapd-instance/db
>>> ../db2ldif -n userRoot -a `pwd`/userRoot.ldif ../db2ldif -n 
>>> NetscapeRoot -a `pwd`/NetscapeRoot.ldif ... repeat for each database

>>> instance
>>>
>>> The migration script will look for a file called 
>>> /opt/fedora-ds/slapd-instance/db/<db instance name>.ldif and use 
>>> that
>>>       
>
>   
>>> rather than the binary files.
>>>
>>> You should also run the migration script with the -x option to force

>>> it to use cross platform mode.
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Reinhard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>   
>>>> -
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list 
>>>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com 
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>>>   
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> --
>>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>> --
>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>   
>>     
>
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>   





More information about the Fedora-directory-users mailing list