[Fedora-directory-users] Re: Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 42, Issue 4

[Rich Megginson]

David Boreham wrote:
>
> Memory is hazy about this, but I seem to remember that it was done as 
> two steps because AD didn't allow userAccountControl to be set in the 
> ADD. It had to be set by a separate MOD. Perhaps AD has changed since 
> that time in this respect though.
No, I broke this in 1.1.3 - it was working fine in 1.1.2.
>
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>> Howard Chu wrote:
>>>> Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 08:13:08 -0700
>>>> From: Rich Megginson<rmeggins at redhat.com>
>>>
>>>> John Dickinson wrote:
>>>>> On 30 Oct 2008, at 16:00, Rich Megginson<rmeggins at redhat.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>>> create user in AD                    userAccountControl: 512 (Normal)
>>>>> create user in Fedora DS (console)   userAccountControl: 546 
>>>>> (Normal +
>>>>> PASSWD_NOTREQ + ACCOUNTDISABLE)
>>>>>
>>>>> Would there be anything wrong with Fedora DS just forcing
>>>>> userAccountControl = 512? Or are more options needed in the user
>>>>> creation dialog?
>>>> I'm not sure.  1.1.3 included a "fix" for userAccountControl.  The way
>>>> it works now is this:
>>>> add new AD entry over LDAP - no userAccountControl attribute is 
>>>> present,
>>>> so it must use some sort of AD default value
>>>> read the new AD entry - get the userAccountControl value
>>>> set AD entry userAccountControl |= 0x200 # 512 == normal account)
>>>>
>>>> So you might try a simple test - add a new AD entry over LDAP 
>>>> outside of
>>>> windows sync - see what the default userAccountControl value is - I'm
>>>> guessing that adding a new AD entry without specifying
>>>> userAccountControl sets it to PASSWD_NOTREQ + ACCOUNTDISABLE
>>>
>>> Yes, users created via LDAP are disabled unless you explicitly 
>>> provide the userAccountControl attribute (with proper flags) in the 
>>> LDAP Add operation. I tripped over this myself the first time I 
>>> loaded up a test database in AD. (It also gave me a Fine Opportunity 
>>> to time how long it took to LDAP Modify all of the users in my test 
>>> database. ugh...)
>>>
>> Then this is a bug in the winsync code.  In the ADD case, it should 
>> just force userAccountControl to the Normal value.  In the MOD case, 
>> it should |= the value.  John, can you open a bug about this issue?  
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -- 
>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
> -- 
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users