[Fedora-directory-users] Warning with vlvindex....

[Rich Megginson]

Reinhard Nappert wrote:
> Rich, 
>
> nsslapd-lastmod is not set, which means it is turned on. I assume that
> you would the timestamps anyway, if you have replicated environment.
>
> Are you going to open a bug, or should I do it?
>   
Go ahead and open a bug for this.  Thanks!
> -Reinhard 
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich
> Megginson
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 2:08 PM
> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Warning with vlvindex....
>
> Reinhard Nappert wrote:
>   
>> Rich, I have just the suffix entry in the directory at this point. I 
>> load this ldif script during setup:
>> This seems to be fine:
>> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Workers finished; 
>> cleaning up...
>> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Workers cleaned up.
>> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Cleaning up producer 
>> thread...
>> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Indexing complete.
>> Post-process
>> ing...
>> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - Nothing to do to build ancestorid index
>> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Flushing caches...
>> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Closing files...
>> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - All database threads now stopped
>> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Import complete.
>> Processed 1 en
>> tries in 0 seconds. (inf entries/sec)
>>
>> Afterwards, I do my vlvindex on the timestamps. I guess that the 
>> import does not set createTimestamp and this is why I get the warning.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>   
>>     
> Sounds like at least two bugs
> 1) createTimestamp should be present, unless you have nsslapd-lastmod
> turned off.
> 2) vlvindex should not give an error message - either its a real error
> (not sure why) or the error message is spurious and should not be
> printed by default
>   
>> -Reinhard
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
>> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich 
>> Megginson
>> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 1:32 PM
>> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
>> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Warning with vlvindex....
>>
>> Reinhard Nappert wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Rich,
>>>
>>> It seems to work. I will load a couple of thousands entries and do 
>>> some tests....
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>> Was the database empty when you ran vlvindex?  If not, what was in it?
>>   
>>     
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
>>> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich 
>>> Megginson
>>> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 12:46 PM
>>> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
>>> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Warning with vlvindex....
>>>
>>> Reinhard Nappert wrote:
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I built FDS 1.1.2 from scratch and installed and configured it. I 
>>>> get
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>   
>>     
>>>> the following warning, when I run a vlvindex. This used to run in 
>>>> any
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>   
>>     
>>>> 1.0.x and 1.1.0 release.
>>>>
>>>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - warning: ancestorid not indexed on 1
>>>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: WARNING: Failed to fetch 
>>>> subtree lists:  (-30990) DB_NOTFOUND: No matching key/data pair 
>>>> found
>>>>
>>>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: Possibly the entrydn or 
>>>> ancestorid index is corrupted or does not exist.
>>>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: Attempting brute-force 
>>>> method
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> instead.
>>>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: Finished indexing.
>>>>
>>>> Dows anybody has an idea?
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> Was the database empty when you started?  It looks as though it 
>>> completed - does the vlv index work?
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Reinhard
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> -
>>>> -
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>>>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>>>   
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> --
>>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>> --
>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>   
>>     
>
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>   

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3258 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20080919/34b7f835/attachment.bin>