[389-users] [fedora-directory-users] NSMMReplicationPlugin messages in errors log

Mike Mercier mmercier at gmail.com
Thu May 21 12:13:47 UTC 2009


Hi,

Is there some way to resolve the timing issue/verify it is fully setup?

I restarted dirsrv, and removed, re-added, and reinitialized (from
server-1) the replication agreement on server-2 and here is what I see
in the logs:

Server-1:
[21/May/2009:07:52:49 -0400] NSMMReplicationPlugin - Beginning total
update of replica "agmt="cn=PKI-Replication-Agreement"
(server-2:389)".
[21/May/2009:07:52:52 -0400] NSMMReplicationPlugin - Finished total
update of replica "agmt="cn=PKI-Replication-Agreement"
(server-2:389)". Sent 53 entries.
[21/May/2009:07:57:03 -0400] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
repl_set_mtn_referrals: could not set referrals for replica dc=pki: 1

Server-2:
[21/May/2009:07:52:49 -0400] - WARNING: Import is running with
nsslapd-db-private-import-mem on; No other process is allowed to
access the database
[21/May/2009:07:52:52 -0400] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
repl_set_mtn_referrals: could not set referrals for replica dc=pki: 1
[21/May/2009:07:52:52 -0400] - import pki: Workers finished; cleaning up...
[21/May/2009:07:52:52 -0400] - import pki: Workers cleaned up.
[21/May/2009:07:52:52 -0400] - import pki: Indexing complete.
Post-processing...
[21/May/2009:07:52:52 -0400] - import pki: Flushing caches...
[21/May/2009:07:52:52 -0400] - import pki: Closing files...
[21/May/2009:07:52:52 -0400] - import pki: Import complete.  Processed
53 entries in 3 seconds. (17.67 entries/sec)
[21/May/2009:07:52:52 -0400] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
multimaster_be_state_change: replica dc=pki is coming online; enabling
replication
[21/May/2009:07:57:03 -0400] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
repl_set_mtn_referrals: could not set referrals for replica dc=pki: 1

Can the repl_set_mtn_referrals message be ignored?

Thanks,
Mike


On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote:
> Mike Mercier wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am getting the following error on both ends of a replication
>> agreement.  The replication agreement is for the fedora dogtag CA
>> application.
>> Note: I had to manually do a few things to get it to work, the
>> automated cloning was failing to setup the replication agreement.
>>
>> NSMMReplicationPlugin - repl_set_mtn_referrals: could not set
>> referrals for replica dc=<dogtag dc>: 1
>>
>
> Looks like some sort of timing thing - like the server has not been fully
> started yet or fully set up yet before it receives the replication request
> from the other master
>>
>> Note: Dogtag and fedora-ds are running on the same systems:
>>
>> Server-1 - fedora-ds and dogtag
>> Server-2 - fedora-ds and dogtag clone
>>
>> Replication agreements between the systems for:
>> o=NetscapeRoot
>> userRoot
>> dogtag dc
>>
>> The error *only* appears for the dogtag dc.
>>
>> In my dse.ldif, I do notice that there is only one nsslapd-referral
>> for the dogtag dc (for server-1 to server-2)
>>
>> Server-1
>>
>> dn: cn="dc=<dogtag dc>",cn=mapping tree, cn=config
>> objectClass: top
>> objectClass: extensibleObject
>> objectClass: nsMappingTree
>> cn: dc=<dogtag dc>
>> cn: "dc=<dogtag dc>"
>> nsslapd-backend: pki
>> nsslapd-state: Backend
>> creatorsName: cn=directory manager
>> modifiersName: cn=server,cn=plugins,cn=config
>> createTimestamp: 20090520160944Z
>> modifyTimestamp: 20090520162351Z
>> nsslapd-referral: ldap://server-2.internaldomain:389/dc%3D<dogtag dc>
>> numSubordinates: 1
>>
>> Server-2
>> dn: cn="dc=<dogtag dc>",cn=mapping tree, cn=config
>> objectClass: top
>> objectClass: extensibleObject
>> objectClass: nsMappingTree
>> cn: dc=<dogtag dc>
>> cn: "dc=<dogtag dc>"
>> nsslapd-backend: pki
>> nsslapd-state: Backend
>> creatorsName: cn=directory manager
>> modifiersName: cn=server,cn=plugins,cn=config
>> createTimestamp: 20090520165422Z
>> modifyTimestamp: 20090520180434Z
>> numSubordinates: 1
>>
>>
>> Searching google doesn't really point to an explanation (or solution)
>> to the error messages.
>> Is it safe to do an ldapmodify to add the entry on Server-2?
>>
>
> Yes, although the replication code is supposed to set that automatically,
> and may overwrite it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>> --
>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>
>
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
>




More information about the Fedora-directory-users mailing list