[389-users] SubjectAltName MMR question

[Rich Megginson]

Prashanth Sundaram wrote:
> Rich,
>
> I specify the individual host’s FQDN in the replication agreement.
So, ldap01.domain.com ?

Maybe openldap/openssl has a problem with subjectAltName? Try mozldap 
ldapsearch instead like this:
/usr/lib/mozldap/ldapsearch -h FQDN -ZZZ -P /etc/dirsrv/slapd-instance 
-s base -b "" "objectclass=*"
> I use haproxy for LB, so the hosts are in ACTIVE-PASSIVE state.
>
>
> Prashanth Sundaram wrote:
>
>     Hi All,
>
>     Which one of the case below is suitable for a Multi-Master
>     replication. I have a load balancer with/ ldap.domain.com,/ which
>     is what clients will use to authenticate.
>
>     *_Question:
>     _*Which one is a better implementation? What are the trade-offs?
>     Please input your feedback as it might be useful for someone
>     coming this way later. This can serve as a knowledge bank.
>
>     Case-I
>     ldap01: server-cert with cn=ldap01.domain.com,
>     subjAltName=ldap.domain.com
>     ldap02: server-cert with cn=ldap02.domain.com,
>     subjAltName=ldap.domain.com
>     -MMR with tls throws error when “*Check hostname against name in
>     certificate for outbound SSL connections”* option is enabled. But
>     RH recommends it to be turned ON.
>
> What is the FQDN you specified in the replication agreement?
>
>
>     Case-II
>     ldap01: server-cert with cn=ldap.domain.com,
>     subjAltName=ldap01.domain.com, ldap02.domain.com ldap01:
>     server-cert with cn=ldap.domain.com,
>     subjAltName=ldap01.domain.com,ldap02.domain.com -Does not comply
>     with the requirement that “server-cert” should have hostname as
>     cn.I found this method working perfectly fine.
>
>     *Knowledge Sharing:
>     *Here’s a useful link which I use all the time and look before
>     posting to the list. This is the archive for the mailing list and
>     has /search/ feature which very useful.
>
>     http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-directory-users redhat
>     com/info.html
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     --
>     389 users mailing list
>     389-users redhat com
>     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Date Prev 
> <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/msg00006.html> 
> ][Date Next 
> <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/msg00008.html> 
> ] [Thread Prev 
> <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/msg00006.html> 
> ][Thread Next 
> <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/msg00008.html> 
> ] [Thread Index 
> <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/thread.html#00007> 
> ] [Date Index 
> <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/date.html#00007> 
> ] [Author Index 
> <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/author.html#00007> 
> ]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>