docs-xml-tags.patch

Gavin Henry gavin.henry at magicfx.co.uk
Mon Oct 13 09:17:29 UTC 2003


On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:36:54 -0400
Tammy Fox <tfox at redhat.com> wrote:

> I finally had time to look at this patch. You are right about the
> changing eps and png to EPS and PNG and adds / to the end. I forgot to
> change that when I converted this doc from SGML to XML.
> 
> In regards to the different types of figures, what is the advantage of
> using different declarations? If they look the same, I would prefer to
> stick to one to make the code as simple as possible.


Nothing really, as far as I could tell. I just read the different ways to do it, although they all look the same. If we want simplicity, then just stick with the one you have, and change the case etc.

Regards, 


-- 
Regards,

Gavin Henry.

Trying to be a RHCE.....
http://www.magicfx.co.uk
http://www.suretecsystems.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20031013/931ac356/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-docs-list mailing list