more defined process

[Mark Johnson]

Dave Pawson wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 22:39, Mark Johnson wrote:
> 
> 
>>>What problem does it solve?
>>
>>Setting up emacsp/sgml, effectively, w/o having to do any setup. 
> 
> Except add to a 'standard' emacs+psgml setup?

Well, yeah. If one has a bunch of psgml configurations, they do tend 
to pile up and often act funny as a result.

> What of people who already are balancing ten different emacs 'standard'
> configurations?

Then they're not newbies and probably wouldn't benefit from adopting 
psgmlx.

> Any conditional sections btw, doesn't matter if they are internal or
> external schema, its still a docbook extension. 

Right, which would *require* us to use a modified FPI and a 
different system identifier, all of which would unnecessarily 
complicate things.

Cheers,
Mark
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------
Mark Johnson                     <mjohnson at redhat.com>
Red Hat Documentation Group      <http://www.redhat.com>
Tel: 919.754.4151                Fax: 919.754.3708
GPG fp: DBEA FA3C C46A 70B5 F120  568B 89D5 4F61 C07D E242