Request for review - update/software management tutorial (updated links)
Tommy Reynolds
Tommy.Reynolds at MegaCoder.com
Sun Apr 3 20:55:23 UTC 2005
Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster at gmail.com>, spake thus:
> > It's really a workaround for the fact that sudo isn't configured by
> > default. I didn't think that I could safely use sudo in the example
> > commands, since even if the Hardening Guide was up and could be linked
> > to, there's no guarantee that the user/admin would have successfully
> > gone through the setup beforehand.
>
> I like the idea of using sudo as well, but Stuart's obviously right in
> the more global sense of not making assumptions when you're writing a
> doc. But... do I sense the need for a sudo-tutorial? :-)
Ahem. Since the postulated reader has the root password anyway (or
"su -c" ain't gonna work anyway) then why not a single paragraph
about adding an entry to "/etc/sudoers"? That done, all that
off-putting, error-prone "su -c 'quote this junk'" disappears.
You may want to add an admonition to clean up after ones self...
Cheers
(I withdraw my previous mea culpa about 1952.)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20050403/538cb26b/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list