documentation scope (Re: why o why [off topic])
Stuart Ellis
s.ellis at fastmail.co.uk
Thu Apr 21 19:37:17 UTC 2005
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 11:24 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> Just like the Fedora Project, we cover only free software. Our first
> priority is to software that is in Core or Extras. Stand-alone docs
> that cover software not in Core or Extras is fine. Docs covering a
> subject area that has several choices will cover the choices in Core or
> Extra primarily. Choices that are outside of the project are noted as
> not being "supported by Fedora".
Do we have an existing document that could cover policy for
scope/lifecycle of docs (what we accept, how we support it, process of
obsoleting old work) ? These issues don't seem to neatly fit just Quick
Start, Documentation or CVS Usage.
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list