[RFC] dumping the CED in favor of local variables
Stuart Ellis
stuart at elsn.org
Thu Apr 28 00:52:11 UTC 2005
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 17:09 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 16:50 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> > I'd like to recommend we dump the usage of CED files in favor of the
> > local variables designation. The CED file is a pre-compiled DTD subset.
>
> For the record, this is a *complete reversal* of my previous position.
> If Dave Pawson is lurking out there, he can laugh at me. The rest of
> you who care can swift-kick when you see/meet me next.
>
> After working with the local variable, I am willing to undergo the pain
> to change over to it. If there is even any pain.
>
> The only problem is _mixing_ the two formats. If I write using the
> Local Variable and you load the CED file, our indenting will be off. At
> the least, diffs will be noisy.
OK. If we can agree on this then we can amend the documents that will
be moving into CVS before they get there.
I admit to total self-interest here: the IG has a fair number of files
and will hopefully have multiple people updating it once it's in.
--
Stuart Ellis
stuart at elsn.org
GPG key fingerprint: 68B0 E291 FB19 C845 E60E 9569 292E E365 7098 ABEA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20050428/ac4b94c0/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list