Approval

[Karsten Wade]

On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 08:08 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Karsten,
> 
> I tried adding the yum doc to the web CVS, and was denied access.  I
> realized that I needed cvsfedora rights in the account system, so I
> applied, but haven't yet been approved.  

Silly me, I had just added you manually to the ACLs.  Naturally, it's
more convoluted than that. :)

> If you have rights to do this,
> it would be great if you could.  Otherwise I can bother someone else, if
> you can make a suggestion... 

I don't have auth to administer that group.  Your request to join
generates an automatic message that goes to the admins, and is regen'd
every 24 hours that it is not addressed.  So, consider them bugged. :)

> Although sponsorship is apparently
> "unneeded," according to the account system, I'm sure that someone would
> feel better if they knew you were vouching for said access. :-)

It's probably Elliot anyway, and he knows who you are.  AIUI,
sponsorship is a concept built into the system.  It is a "who to go to
in case this guy messes stuff up," a sort of guarantee to clean-up after
someone else's mistakes.  It seems to be enabled so far for only
cvsextras.  In other words, nothing here is mission critical enough to
require such a sponsorship chain. :)

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
                       Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20050815/513d913d/attachment.sig>