xmlformat licensing
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Mon Jun 13 14:55:51 UTC 2005
Excuse the reply to myself, just wanted to clarify something:
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 10:10 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Because the REX software, and thus xmlformat, clearly meet all the
> requirements of the open source definition, we should be able to use it
> in our toolchain without incurring any difficulty. (REX probably also
> meets the definition of "free software," although it is not copylefted
> and thus does not share the same distinction as GPL software.) I'll
> prepare an RPM of this package and see about getting it into Fedora
> Extras. In the meantime, we can keep testing and evaluating other
> methods of XML normalization. So far, xmlformat does the best job that
> I've seen, but I'm sure there must be other tools out there.
An RPM is probably overkill for this tool. It's "just" (!) a Perl
script, so it would just as easily sit in the docs-common/scripts/
folder, along with a configuration file setting FDP standards for
normalization. Alternately, someone with more Perl-fu could check the
script for security and then try for FE. I think that doing so means
the maintainer is making some representations about security which I'm
not qualified to do... so you could call this the "prudent wimp-out"
factor. :-)
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20050613/fdb2c7d8/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list