CVS problem
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Thu Jun 9 19:45:47 UTC 2005
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 13:56 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 12:03 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
>
> > Possible solutions are:
> >
> > A) Document, document, document the proper (nonstandard)
> > procedure for importing a document and ask newbies to follow
> > it unerringly; or
> >
> > B) Provide a shell script that will do the cleanup and importing
> > for them and ask that they use the script instead of doing the
> > CVS import themselves. We'll still have to clean up the
> > mess when they ignore the script and try to learn about CVS
> > by doing the import manually; or
> >
> > C) Write a PGP(?) / Wiki(?) / HTML(?) / Java(?) page that will do
> > the selective importing if the newbie just identifies the
> > top-level directory in a form. Very similar to attaching a
> > file to a Yahoo mail message. or
> >
> > D) Keep the "docs-common" as a peer directory that needs be
> > updated only when the CVS structure changes or when a document
> > fails to build because of a missing entity.
>
> Ah, I see.
>
> Having docs-common as a peer directory seems to be the least
> mainentance, hassle, and chance of breaking in a bad way.
>
> We can easily have a list of common errors in the Documentation Guide
> that mean you need to look for an update to docs-common.
>
> Options A, B, and C require too much for the value they bring.
>
> Option D only risks minor problems for the user that teaches them better
> how to fish when it happens.
I don't think B sounds too hard either. And it goes hand-in-hand with
the Documentation Guide's "LearnAsYouGo" slant. I'll make this part of
the considerations for the hands-on portion, with the idea that it will
be equally helpful to participants who don't need as much hand-holding.
> > My point is the current setup has a painless, no-error-possible
> > document import. I don't really care if a stylesheet changes an
> > indent from 0.5in to 0.56in because the document rendering on the
> > local system isn't critical. Anyone wanting "proper" documents can
> > just update the "docs-common" before sending the PDF to the printers.
>
> I agree with this except that the current setup does need a tweak, which
> is why we have this thread. Elliott pointed out the messiness of all
> the little directories that docs-setup brings down, and he was echoing
> something that I thought. Already we have four directories that need to
> be brought down to peer level and updated separately.
>
> Reading between the lines in your post, I *think* you agree with this
> reason for moving everything into a single module, docs-common.
Makes sense to me too.
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20050609/e1c4100c/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list