[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: xmlformat licensing



On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 12:49 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 11:56 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 10:10 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > Here are the facts of licensing pertaining to xmlformat:
> > > 
> > > (A) The original portions of xmlformat by Paul DuBois, paul at kitebird
> > > com, are licensed under a BSD-style license.[4]  The BSD-style license
> > > is an open source license.  The only portion of xmlformat not covered by
> > > this license is the implementation of the REX shallow parser.
> > > 
> > > (B) The REX shallow parser, which is copyrighted by Robert D. Cameron,
> > > cameron at sfu ca, is licensed under terms shown below in their
> > > entirety:
> > 
> > BSD and MIT are both FOSS licenses.
> 
> If only the REX author had used one of those! :-)

How many clauses did you omit in your original description of the REX
license?

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez ivazquez net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]