[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: xmlformat licensing



On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 13:00 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 12:49 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 11:56 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 10:10 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > > Here are the facts of licensing pertaining to xmlformat:
> > > > 
> > > > (A) The original portions of xmlformat by Paul DuBois, paul at kitebird
> > > > com, are licensed under a BSD-style license.[4]  The BSD-style license
> > > > is an open source license.  The only portion of xmlformat not covered by
> > > > this license is the implementation of the REX shallow parser.
> > > > 
> > > > (B) The REX shallow parser, which is copyrighted by Robert D. Cameron,
> > > > cameron at sfu ca, is licensed under terms shown below in their
> > > > entirety:
> > > 
> > > BSD and MIT are both FOSS licenses.
> > 
> > If only the REX author had used one of those! :-)
> 
> How many clauses did you omit in your original description of the REX
> license?

None.  The licensing text is reproduced *in its entirety*, as I stated
in my message.  The license is attached to the implementations of REX
written by the author of the paper from which they are drawn.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]