[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Saxon?

On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 17:06 +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
> What's all this about changing xmlto to use Saxon instead of xsltproc?
> How will that fix PDF output?

The DocBook developers mainly use a Java toolchain of Saxon and FOP,

By following the same or closely related toolchain, we benefit in many

It makes sense to keep our work within the bounds of the formal DocBook
and XML specifications, for all the usual reasons.

If the problem is that Saxon and FOP are not in Fedora Extras, we will
get them packaged and maintained.

- Karsten
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
                       Red Hat SELinux Guide

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]