Saxon?
Tim Waugh
twaugh at redhat.com
Fri Jun 17 08:41:35 UTC 2005
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 05:05:43PM -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Uttered Tim Waugh <twaugh at redhat.com>, spake thus:
>
> > Maybe we should be looking at xmlroff, which doesn't have a dependency
> > on *yet another* XML parser
>
> Xmlroff just doesn't work at all yet. Try converting the IG, for instance.
>
> At least these saxon/fop partially function.
It's unfair to say it doesn't work at all, but it certainly isn't
something that will work for everything right now, that's true.
But I do really question the benefit of switching xmlto to using
Saxon. We should be concentrating effort on the XSL-FO -> PDF step,
not the XML -> XSL-FO step which already works perfectly well.
Tim.
*/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20050617/796c47d1/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list