Are Fedora docs readable?

[Tommy Reynolds]

Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster at gmail.com>, spake thus:

> I think we should consider requiring documentation to include a
> prominent link in the DTD comments that points people to a "how to build
> this document" spot on f.r.c.  Anyone care to comment?

Well, none of the source code I come across on the web has a "how to
compile me" comment in the "main.c" file ;-)

If folks come in by the backdoor via a Google search, and the don't bother to move up a level in the URL if there's something they don't understand then is a comment somewhere going to help them?

The reason my reply to the OP was border-line snide was to suggest that the question was not answerable in its current form and that the OP needed to do a bit more homework.

I think this is really a non-problem.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20050510/436bb5f8/attachment.sig>