CVS vendor and release tags

tuxxer tuxxer at cox.net
Tue May 17 01:41:47 UTC 2005


On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 20:36 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Uttered tuxxer <tuxxer at cox.net>, spake thus:
> 
> > I was wondering about that.  The directory structure on my own system
> > was equally "funky".  I was curious how it might look in the CVS system.
> 
> Then we need to clarify the importing process:
> 
> 	$ cvs import $(basename $PWD) <myname> "initial"
> 
> does that notation help matters any?

Yup.  That makes sense.  Should I release (I think that's the right
term) the document and re-import it?

I need to correct my local directory structure anyway.

-Charlie

-- 
-tuxxer

gpg:  57EB F948 76AE 25BC E340  EFA9 FAF6 E1AC F1E1 1EA1
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20050516/cdf7d391/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-docs-list mailing list