CVS vendor and release tags
tuxxer
tuxxer at cox.net
Tue May 17 01:41:47 UTC 2005
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 20:36 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Uttered tuxxer <tuxxer at cox.net>, spake thus:
>
> > I was wondering about that. The directory structure on my own system
> > was equally "funky". I was curious how it might look in the CVS system.
>
> Then we need to clarify the importing process:
>
> $ cvs import $(basename $PWD) <myname> "initial"
>
> does that notation help matters any?
Yup. That makes sense. Should I release (I think that's the right
term) the document and re-import it?
I need to correct my local directory structure anyway.
-Charlie
--
-tuxxer
gpg: 57EB F948 76AE 25BC E340 EFA9 FAF6 E1AC F1E1 1EA1
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20050516/cdf7d391/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list