Fedora websites mailing list and Wiki ownership
Karsten Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Tue Nov 1 04:34:16 UTC 2005
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 21:53 +0000, Stuart Ellis wrote:
> I think that different types of content require different arrangements,
> and the same considerations probably apply whatever the technology (Wiki
> or static pages).
>
> Pages with certain kinds of content need to be carefully maintained, and
> may need more stringent change control than is usual. Material like:
>
> - Legal and policy statements
> - Project admin, e.g. schedules
> - Download pages (with URLs and checksums)
> - "Shop-front" pages, like the front page and FAQ, intended to be seen
> by the new and unwary
>
> For other stuff, it may be best to let people get on and produce
> whatever they need. Having one person per category to act as a
> maintainer, moderator and point of contact is probably enough.
This sounds like a reasonable compromise of control, applying more where
it is needed, less where it gets in the way.
> FWIW, I really like Patrick's idea of having of a mailing list for
> official and third-party Website maintainers to get together.
I have request fedora-websites-list and will announce it here when it is
ready. A post to fedora-announce also seems in order.
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20051031/e2eba905/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list