[RFC] Packaging technology update

[Tommy Reynolds]

Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster at gmail.com>, spake thus:

> Although that means revision histories will be written differently
> than they are now, that's not a problem.  DocBook doesn't mandate
> an order for them, so any way we want to do them is acceptable.

Well, we can output the changelog in any order we choose.  Instead of
an <xsl:for-each> construct, something along the lines of
"blah/blah/revision[count()-position()]" could reverse the order.

I figured that nicety could wait.

Cheers
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20051127/f81454e2/attachment.sig>