{RFC] XSLT for draft watermarking?

[Stuart Ellis]

On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 11:41 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote:

> Documents built locally from CVS can never be "production" because
> they are not official copies.  To emphasis this, we now have a
> watermark indicating its draft status.
> 
> Documents obtained from DocsRawHide can never be "production" and
> need to be watermarked as draft.

> We really need only one CSS stylesheet in the docs CVS: the
> fedora-draft.css file, and we have that.
> 
> Any official-looking document renderings should come from whom ever
> is constructing the official-looking release, but anything in our CVS
> is strictly for draft documents.

I agree. This is in line with the general trademark policy, too (people
can freely copy, modify, and then rebrand, but not pass off modified
copies as an "official Fedora" product).

-- 

Stuart Ellis

stuart at elsn.org

Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/

GPG key ID: 7098ABEA
GPG key fingerprint: 68B0 E291 FB19 C845 E60E  9569 292E E365 7098 ABEA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20051130/10b81ac9/attachment.sig>