<command> vs <application>
Brad Smith
brads at redhat.com
Thu Sep 8 20:48:39 UTC 2005
> We've had a convention of not including the prompt at all. This is
> different from other UNIX documentation. However, I don't think anyone
> has complained.
>
> My guess is, the prompt was dropped for clarity sake? In RH docs, we
> use <prompt> only when specifically discussing the prompt, otherwise
> it's left out for visual clarity, I reckon.
Hmm.. My concern about this is that since sometimes a prompt is
necessary eg to differentiate between stationX and stationY in a
networking example, we should always show a prompt. Otherwise it looks
wierd and inconsistent to have a prompt for some commands, but not for
others.
Opinions?
--Brad
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20050908/4e837685/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list