just Fedora [RFC]

Karsten Wade kwade at redhat.com
Wed Dec 6 21:31:04 UTC 2006


On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 02:44 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

> I already started doing this in the documentation that I am working 
> with. I think it makes better sense to not marginalize Fedora Extras 
> unncessarily even in the current release process

Good point.  We can supplement instructions for FC6-related
documentation to say,

"Use 'Fedora Extras' only when referring to:

* Processes about getting involved in packaging;
* When discussing enabling a separate FE repo

Otherwise, we can effectively consider FE and FC to all be just F(edora)
now."


-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor    ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20061206/35915bbc/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-docs-list mailing list