Admin Guide / Accounts - call for feedback

Rahul Sundaram sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Wed Dec 13 08:58:43 UTC 2006


Vladimir Kosovac wrote:
> Paul W. Frields wrote:
>> On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 05:36 -0800, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
>>> Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster at gmail.com>, spake thus:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 12:52 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>>>> Vladimir Kosovac wrote:
>>>>>> I have couple of sandboxed pages ready for your review/input at:
>>>>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/wiki/VladimirKosovac/StylingPage/WorkPage
>>>>> For example, if I am doing web services administration, I would expect
>>>>> to learn about system-config-httpd in that section along with the Apache
>>>>> configuration details.
>>>> That's an excellent point Rahul makes -- that our documentation should
>>>> be largely task-based.  Relevant material should be lumped together
>>>> where possible and logical.
>>> Agree emphatically.
>>>
>>> What I detest is "feature-oriented" documentation that mostly walks
>>> around the buttons and menus of a GUI, or is an elaborated bullet
>>> list of each separate feature (even if the elaboration runs to pages
>>> or chapters).  I'm as guilty as anyone about doing this ("My name
>>> is Tommy. Chorus: Hi, Tommy!") but I'm recovering ;-)
> 
> Am I understanding these suggestions well if I then say that tables on
> the intro page are redundant. To me, they look just like the stuff we
> want to avoid - feature listing for GUI tools - although more obscure.
> Scrap them, then?

Like I said, that kind of information is better for reference when you 
do want to know a complete listing of the system configuration tools. 
Move it as a addendum.

Rahul




More information about the fedora-docs-list mailing list