fdp-info-*.xml a generated file?
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Sat Feb 11 16:47:19 UTC 2006
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 10:19 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Uttered Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com>, spake thus:
>
> > If fdp-info-*.xml is a generated file (right?) should we -not- check a
> > version into CVS? When the rpm-info.xml is present, the fdp-info file
> > is created from that, right?
>
> That is correct. The "fdp-info-*.xml" files are generated and should
> not be checked into CVS.
>
> If make(1) complains about not finding an "fdp-info-*.xml" file,
> there is something wrong with "Makefile.common".
>
> AIUI, stickster was helping with this. If you get this answer and
> it's still broken, let me know and I'll investigate.
Yup, on the case. (For whatever that's worth.) I noticed this at
checkout this morning and will remove the offending files if Karsten
hasn't done so already.
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20060211/0bf59e28/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list