Adding rendered HTML to RPM packaging

[Tommy Reynolds]

Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster at gmail.com>, spake thus:

> > Should we also include the rendered HTML files in the .noarch.rpm or
> > should we have an additional version?
> What's the use case for additional rendered HTML files?

"Seems A Shame To Waste Them"(tm)

Cheers
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20060123/bf1476a7/attachment.sig>