Wireless Guide / NTFS Guide / New writing

[Paul W. Frields]

On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 14:17 +0000, Adam Moreland wrote:
> NTFS, guide could still be done then, if written correctly, am i right in 
> assuming this?? I think i need help, before ploughing into documentation, 
> with such complex legal, or patent encumbered policies, and apologies for 
> the seemingly rediculous arguements i have amde, it is simply just not 
> enough to have aone or two docs on the subject, we need guides and 
> recomendations on where to get this stuff (native drivers i mean) and if 
> they are shippe,d how to active them.

Speaking only for NTFS and an official FDP doc, I would say this should
wait, just until we have a decision on the driver inclusion issue.  Note
that, as Patrick mentioned before, nothing stops you from working on
this with a non-official group such as Fedora Unity.  I don't think
anyone can guarantee for you that your work could be made official until
we have a decision on the main issue, which is including the NTFS kernel
module itself.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
     Fedora Project Board: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20060703/853dba16/attachment.sig>