Linux kernel changes on the release notes

[Karsten Wade]

On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 18:18 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I strongly believe it should provide references to this information but 
> not include them within the release notes itself.  We should provide a 
> list of bug reports fixed with equivalent bugzilla links. We should also 
> summarize and present major known issues and total bug count. Our build 
> system should do this along with the rawhide reports. As an example, 
> this is pretty useful - http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/rumblingedge/

Yes, definitely.  If we do not get someone in the project to do this
work, I'm hoping to grab the tail of similar tools for the RHEL side of
the house.  A generated table with bug # that links to the report and
the bug summary.  I agree, this information is desired and useful to
many people.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
Content Services                          Fedora Documentation Project
http://www.redhat.com/docs   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20060312/8c597e1a/attachment.sig>