[Fwd: [Fedora Project Wiki] Update of "Docs/Beats/Extras"...

[Paul W. Frields]

On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 06:22 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 17:57 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > Not sure how we want to treat this... The Release Notes are explicitly
> > about Fedora Core, and not Extras.  
> 
> Perhaps we want to rethink that.  Since we tout that "with Yum in
> Anaconda, it is all the same now," we might have to treat the relnotes
> the same way.  I know that, by being on the system and all that, there
> is an implicit connection between relnotes and installed system, but
> with the lines blurring in the installation side, we need to consider
> how to deal with it on the notes side.

Good point, that.

> One advantage of actually have the Docs/Beats/Extras section is that any
> number of new pages could be added in that namespace.  We then get a
> bunch of organized, useful, Extras release notes.
> 
> Personally, I'm curious to see where this takes us.  I was surprised at
> the attention of Extras in the notes, and am curious what would happen
> if we encourage Extras maintainers to use The Release Notes as their
> release notes, too.

I'm happy to be overruled.  So for now -- assuming we don't get a huge
amount of material in -- we leave as is.  If we get a big influx of
material we can refactor it into subpages.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
       Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board
    Fedora Docs Project:  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20060914/b89cc21f/attachment.sig>