Voting System Conflicts

[Karsten Wade]

As per this consensus, we'll proceed until the previously decided
nomination closing time (23:59 UTC today) to see if enough candidates
appear to stand for FDSCo election.  If not, we'll postpone FDSCo
elections until the end of the month, freeing up the voting system for
others to use.

On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 08:41 +0300, John Babich wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2007 5:44 AM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen <docs-list at fedoralinks.org> wrote:
> > Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 18:33 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
> > >> Moving over to f-docs-l for discussion.
> > >>
> > >> FAMSCo is politely requesting our slot to do their elections, since they
> > >> are now ready; details below.
> > >>
> > >> If we had a full slate of candidates, I wouldn't want to move our
> > >> election and would ask them to take it up after the 24th of December.
> > >> However, we're a bit shy on candidates.
> > >>
> > >> Should we take the extra time?
> > >
> > > Thanks for bringing this to the list.  FWIW, I think we should decide at
> > > nomination closing time, 2359 UTC on 2007-12-12.  If we don't have
> > > enough nominations, no reason to make a logjam.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I agree with Paul.
> >
> > Robert 'Bob' Jensen
> >
> +1
> 
-- 
Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20071212/353ac04d/attachment.sig>