Fedora 7 Test 1 and release notes
Karsten Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Fri Feb 9 16:14:26 UTC 2007
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 21:08 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Which is why I said that individual developers need to be more proactive
> on passing on important upstream as well as Fedora specific changes. Any
> single person doing it is going to be painful.
+1
It is a SERIOUS problem that Fedora developers, for the most part, do
not make any content changes in Docs/Beats/. The space has been there
for months, they could be making continual notes in public about their
section of the release, but they do not.
We are missing a big opportunity here. I think FDP is doing all it can
to move this forward. I escalated the problem to the board.
When it is this easy[1] to file a release note, there is simply no
excuse not to do it.
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/ReleaseNotes/Process#submitting
> I think we are aiming at a different audience for each of the test
> releases. We need to agree on and pass on that to the wider folks involved.
+1 ... about time we do that. Make it very clear in the announcement:
test1 -- for developers, use at your own risk, contains many half-baked
items
test2 -- for early adopters, most things should work and we REALLY NEED
YOUR HELP to find what is broken
test3 -- for beta users, this is the place where we MUST HAVE full
community participation; otherwise, when it is released and doesn't work
on our hardware, it is you who suffers the most.
Like that?
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project
Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20070209/2b8fcbf6/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list