help define our workflow, other notes

[Karsten Wade]

On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 16:05 -0600, Jonathan Steffan wrote:

> This should be up for more discussion when in Draft. Some times it is
> just a small trivial edit and the change will be pushed to CVS when we
> move to "stable".

Just remember that Plone is just another VCS user at this point.  We
could introduce conflicts in the file and have to manually merge.

Presumably this would be a crazy thing for Plone to handle.  Perhaps it
can throw a warning when it gets CVS conflicts, telling the user to fix
it manually.  If Plone can expose the file for manual fixes, that's fine
too.

> I've attached the new draft diagram of what our workflow might come
> close to looking like. Expect more revisions but this should help clue
> people into the whole "workflow" system more. The latest worflow draft
> is "workflow2.png" ... I've attached old work so everyone can see.

Friends - it is definitely time for some input.

Most of you will use this new system to publish documents.

Many of us will write with this system.

If we do this correctly, everything we do will be 10x easier and 10x
better.

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20070713/c4c61ebc/attachment.sig>