SELinux content (was BTW Guys)

[Paulo Santos]

Karsten,

If you dont mind having a "noob" writer to start with this, i wouldnt mind
to maintain it.
I've allways been wanting to enhance my knowledge about SELinux, so i find
this a good oportunity if you guys want of course.


Thanks,
Paulo


On 6/12/07, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 13:05 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> >
> > Dan -- we don't have anyone maintaining a canonical SELinux FAQ.
>
> I wrote up a better set of questions for Dan, and communicated it
> directly.  He is recommending that we point upstream
> (selinuxproject.org) to a "What Makes Fedora Different?" page.  (See
> below for that thread.)
>
> Personally, I'm not sure.  I think having Fedora-specific how-to
> information should live *here*, referring to the upstream as the overall
> source for FAQs and such.
>
> But then it needs to be maintained here.  And someone has to take all of
> Dan Walsh's blog entries, and some of James Morris's, etc., and include
> them, etc.
>
> One thing we can try is to take the latest content from the SELinux FAQ
> (FC5) and put it at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux/FAQ.  I
> hesitate to do it, but we could redirect all of docs.fp.o/selinux-faq.*
> to that page.  That would peel off 10% of docs.fp.o traffic to the Wiki,
> but it's all the same hardware right now so the load difference may not
> matter to anyone.
>
> Then at least there would be a fighting chance for it to be updated ...
>
> On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 12:45 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > > Dan:
> > >
> > > I Cc:'d you on a discussion on fedora-docs-list.  We need to resolve
> the
> > > fact that SELinux is a popular document hit, but the content is two
> > > releases outdated.
> > >
> > > Can you join us in that discussion?
> > >
> > > Ideas we had so far:
> > >
> > > * Find a writer to update it (slim success)
> > > * Dump the current version into fp.o/wiki/SELinux/FAQ and get you all
> to
> > > update it, then set up an Apache redirect to send
> > > docs.fp.o/selinux-faq.* to that page
> > > * Donate the content upstream to selinuxproject.org
> > >
> > > On the last, we're pretty sure it is valuable to have a
> Fedora-specific
> > > document.  However, we _could_ push the content upstream and then do
> our
> > > own custom version of that, if upstream (selinuxproject.org) would be
> > > interested _and_ would maintain it.
> > >
> > > thx - Karsten
> > >
> > Yes I was trying to respond to that but I did not understand what you
> > wanted me to do.  I think the best idea is to link to the
> > selinuxproject.org and have a What makes Fedora Different page.
>
> --
>    Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project
> Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |   fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
>    quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
> ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
>
> --
> fedora-docs-list mailing list
> fedora-docs-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20070612/e6a40ad9/attachment.htm>