conduct of meetings and voting in FDSCo
Karsten Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Mon Mar 5 17:15:56 UTC 2007
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 08:16 +0300, John Babich wrote:
> As long as the IRC meetings can alternate and cover all the participants,
> I'm in agreement.
I think the key is to choose one of these formats:
A. Three-hour meeting that goes across enough timeslots to get everyone
(still looking for a good cross)
B. Two meetings times that alternate (every other week), e.g.
Sunday/Monday (first losses Bob, second losses Paul)
We just need glezos to weigh in on this page:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BobJensen/MeetingTimes
... and we can pick a time to start with. When mcgiwer is back in the
fold, we can revisit. :)
If the meetings are more optional, that is, if we get business done
on-list, then we can be flexible about when until we get the right mix.
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project
Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20070305/d60d3a85/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list