Publican question

[Karsten 'quaid' Wade]

On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 09:23 +1000, Jeff Fearn wrote:

> Jared Smith wrote:
> > 1) Do we want the toolchain to be able to detect the version of FOP and
> > adjust itself accordingly?
> 
> This is probably the best approach, however different versions of FOP require 
> different configuration files and font metrics files. So we really want to keep 
> the number of supported version to a low number, like say 2 :)

How about three+?  This is because we have Fedora N, Fedora N-1,
rawhide, and EPEL 5.  I'm reckoning that you might want to see the a
preferred version of fop in EPEL.  We'll continue to need it working in
the current, current-minus-one, and rawhide.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20080219/17647a4b/attachment.sig>