GCC and Eclipse beats hashed out
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Wed May 7 16:39:56 UTC 2008
Hm, there shouldn't have been. I think those were hashed out because in
the XML, everything under Devel/ becomes part of the Devel.xml file, so
there's no sense in tracking them all separately while we were working
on editing the beats together. Are those changes in the XML now?
Paul
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 09:24 +1000, Murray McAllister wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/BeatStatus, are there any
> reasons for the following being hashed out:
>
> ##|| [:Docs/Beats/Devel/Tools/GCC]
> ##|| [:Docs/Beats/Devel/Tools/Eclipse]
>
> There were quite a few changes missing for the Eclipse section in the
> GA release notes...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Murray.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> pub 1024D/81B3FDEB 2007-09-19 [expires: 2008-09-18]
> Key fingerprint = 4ED9 9907 5BF0 4132 2B46 20D1 C0C6 362D 81B3 FDEB
> Murray McAllister (Fedora Docs Project / mdious) <murray.mcallister at gmail.com>
> sub 2048g/B04CFA0C 2007-09-19 [expires: 2008-09-18]
>
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20080507/d1218170/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list