[Fwd: FedoraProject page FUDCon/FUDConF11 has been changed byanonymous user 192.168.1.25]

[Paul W. Frields]

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:22:04AM -0800, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 01:03:03PM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:51:46PM -0500, John J. McDonough wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karsten 'quaid' Wade" 
> > >> Is there a reason to archive the beats-per-release?
> > >
> > > For a new beat writer, being able to view the previous release's beats 
> > > would be a big win.  Even for someone who wrote the previous release 
> > > notes, reviewing what happened six months ago could be handy.
> > 
> > No doubt the Archive: pages would be easier than going through page
> > histories.  No problem here if we want to move using a hierarchy of
> > some kind, I just didn't want to ignore page naming guidelines.  On
> > the other hand, Archive: isn't searched by default so renaming may be
> > irrelevant.
> 
> That was why we thought not to bother renaming to Archive; esp. since
> archiving is usually just per page rather than tracking a history.
> 
> In this case, if having the full history per release is useful to
> writers, then it does make sense to rename following a common scheme:
> 
> Docs/Beats/Devel for F10 => Archive:Devel_beat_F10
> or                       => Archive:Relnotes-Devel_beat_F10
> 
> Not sure ... since 'beat' is used by >1 group now (as it should!), do
> we want to start identifying the release notes beats separately?

Yes, but I would use full words to improve search results, since
"relnotes" is a jargon thing.

"Archive:F10_Release_notes_Devel_beat"

Note all underscores, since I'm pretty sure that hyphens have a
deleterious effect on searching.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20081120/345d284c/attachment.sig>